Content does not feel like king as it is not benefiting from the FAST Channel bubble

In the rapidly evolving landscape of digital media, the adage “content is king” has been a guiding principle for creators and distributors alike. However, in the burgeoning ecosystem of Free Ad-supported Streaming TV (FAST) channels, this maxim is being challenged. Here’s an exploration of why content may not wear the crown in the FAST channel domain.

The Illusion of Value in FAST Channels

FAST channel operators are currently engaged in a high-stakes game of valuation speculation. With eyes fixed on future profits, they are raising significant capital based on potential rather than present returns. This speculative approach is reminiscent of the dotcom bubble, where the promise of technology often overshadowed the tangible value of content.

Unfortunately some FAST Channel operators are failing to release that as the content raised their value and in turn funding, they are not rewarding the content owners.

The SaaS Conundrum

To support their operations, FAST channels are turning to Software as a Service (SaaS) providers for their technological needs. These SaaS platforms offer a seemingly cost-effective solution for channel operators to quickly launch and scale their services. However, the affordability is deceptive. The technology stacks come with hefty fees, which, while facilitating fundraising for channel operators, do not translate into immediate revenue generation and any revenue is subject to multiple taxes, but the channel operators win via third party funding.

Content Creators: The Undervalued Party

Amidst this financial frenzy, the content creators and owners find themselves at the bottom of the value chain. Despite being the lifeblood of any media platform, they are often the least compensated. The current model of FAST channels, with its focus on raising capital and covering technology costs, leaves little room for fair remuneration of content.

YouTube: A Simpler Alternative but not great

For content creators, platforms like YouTube offer a more straightforward and potentially more lucrative avenue. By bypassing the complexities and uncertainties of FAST channels, creators can directly monetize their content through ad revenue and fan contributions. The platform’s established infrastructure and vast audience also provide a level of stability and visibility that emerging FAST channels struggle to match.

Conclusion: Rethinking the Ecosystem

The FAST channel ecosystem is at a crossroads. To sustain long-term growth and foster a healthy environment for all stakeholders, it must recalibrate its priorities. This includes ensuring that content creators are adequately rewarded for their contributions. Only then can the industry move beyond the shadow of the dotcom boom and establish a model that truly values content as the cornerstone of its success.

In conclusion, while the FAST channel ecosystem is thriving on the surface, it’s essential to look beyond the veneer of high valuations and recognize the underlying issues. For a sustainable future, the industry must shift its focus back to content, ensuring that those who create it are justly rewarded and that the value they bring is acknowledged as the real king.

Without content there is no FAST channel and it costs so much more to produce it.

Discover more from Rathergood TV

Subscribe to get the latest posts to your email.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Back to top

Discover more from Rathergood TV

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading